THE SPACE IN BETWEEN ROTTEN TOMATOES MOVIEOutside of IMDB, Rotten Tomatoes is the most popular movie site on the web. See the "Fresh" movies skip the "Rotten" ones. The average consumer doesn't think, "yes, I've heard the movie is good, but HOW good?" She just wants to know if she should see it or not. Matches how many of us think about movies.For Rotten Tomatoes, that's the only editorial involvement when calculating scores. Outside of the occasional mixed review, it's pretty easy to tell whether a given reviewer liked or disliked a film. This immediately makes sense to everyone. It's the percentage of people who liked the movie. Before we get to some raw data analysis, let's look at the more obvious pros and cons. I've had several debates about these two approaches. They refuse to disclose these weights, which is both pompous, and in my mind, smart. THE SPACE IN BETWEEN ROTTEN TOMATOES FULLFinally, Metacritic weights the critics’ review scores according to each publication's "quality and overall stature" ( see the full explanation here). They convert four-stars ratings like you'd expect (3 out of 4 stars = 75/100), letter grades a bit differently than you might expect (a C+ gets a 58/100) and most subjectively, assign their own scores when the critic does not (for example, they might assign an 80 to a fairly positive review with a few reservations). Metacritic editors must convert critics' scores to fit their model, with some methods more controversial than others. Which critics? A prestigious group of 30-50 writers from the most recognizable names in the industry (New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun-Times, etc.). The Metascore is not a percentage: it's a weighted average of scores from top critics, normalized on a scale from 0 to 100. Think high school: as long as you don't get an F, you pass. If a single percentage figure wasn't simple enough, Rotten Tomatoes categorizes every movie as either "Fresh" or "Rotten," based on whether the percentage is above or below 60%. ( See the full explanation here.) For popular films, Rotten Tomatoes counts over 200 different reviewers. Which people? Print publications, broadcast outlets, and online publications, each of which must maintain a certain level of traffic, quality, and consistency to be counted. The Tomatometer reflects the percentage of people who liked a given movie. With all that said, here is my definitive guide to Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, complete with critiques, graphs, a scatterplot, and final recommendations. **Okay, that's the single most pretentious thing I've ever written. Unlike that Facebook recommendation from Stacey or the one-off ‘professional’ post from a guest reviewer for the Chicago Tribune, you'll rarely get bad advice after distilling 30+ opinions down to one. Sites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic can give you the general consensus ahead of time. There's little worse than shelling out $15 (or $30 on a date, or $60 with a family) to see Smurfs 2, only to discover that repeatedly wapping your head with the ticket turnstile would have made for a more pleasant evening. After all, the most important opinion is your own.įor us lay folk, however, a single score is convenient, helpful, and sometimes, indispensable. THE SPACE IN BETWEEN ROTTEN TOMATOES FREEOn the one hand, I can't imagine how much free time they must have to see every piece of garbage that gets released, but I still respect the sentiment, in principle. Representing a 2-hour work of art with a single, sterile number like "73" is cinematic sacrilege! I regard these individuals with equal parts skepticism and respect. Connery expertly fills the bill," wrote Janet Maslin for The New York Times.Many full-time movie fans ignore these scores. "In 'Never Say Never Again,' the formula is broadened to accommodate an older, seasoned man of much greater stature, and Mr. The title was reportedly inspired by Connery's wife who told her husband that he couldn't say he'd "never" return to Bond again. So, in 1983, McClory commissioned a remake of 'Thunderball," titled "Never Say Never Again" starring Connery once again, for a non-Eon Bond film. It's a remake of the 1965 movie "Thunderball," which also starred Connery, which was in turn based on the 1961 Fleming novel of the same name.ĭue to conflicts between Fleming and producer Kevin McClory, McClory ended up with the rights to "Thunderball" and anything introduced in that story, including SPECTRE. "Never Say Never Again" is the result of some complicated rights issues from the Ian Fleming novels the Bond movies are based on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |