![]() ![]() If there is a stair-like decorative element in the design scheme, perhaps a case could be made - but I'm not aware of any code enforcement official that would buy that argument if an occupant was still able to use it as a stairway. I don't see where the IRC allows for non-code-compliant stairways to be constructed if a code compliant stairway exists - this is a safety issue related to fall protection that would apply to all stairways if they are used as stairways. The open-sided stairs that we sometimes see in publications would have to either be the result of a waiver issued by the local code enforcement entity, or else there is some other mitigating factor (clear glass guard, etc.). ![]() ![]() My understanding of the IRC is that Stairways always require guards and/or handrails depending on conditions, e.g., if there are less than 4 risers or the vertical dropoff is less than 30" then the stair would not need to comply. That the owner insisted won't matter, especially if the injured person is a visitor or later owner.īut those beautiful photos will probably bring in great clients, who will all want open stairs, or ladders instead of stairs, or something else that sidesteps the codes. Thankfully, she is not asking for a ladder to the sleeping loft.Īrchitects can find ways around the inspection but I don't believe there is any way to avoid the liability if an accident occurs. Now I'm throwing cold water on her vision for a major feature in her house. I'm already the bearer of bad news in explaining (surprisingly high) construction costs to someone who has no prior experience with construction. I have a client right now who has shown me an open stair as the inspiration for her stair construction. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |